Home

Advertisement

Customize
Clay Percocet Story

May 2009

S M T W T F S
     12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31      

Tags

Powered by LiveJournal.com
Clay Percocet Story

The NCAA is like a Big Dick

It likes screwing players.

In explanation, they denied (former) Cincinatti quarterback Ben Mauk a sixth-year of eligibility, which I firmly believe he should have gotten. Mauk enrolled at Wake Forest in 2003 and was redshirted, then played the next two years for Wake. In his first game of 2006 he had an injury that practically destroyed his throwing arm, forcing him to sit out the rest of the season while he healed. After the '06 season he took advantage of a now defunct NCAA rule that allowed graduate students with athletic eligibility remaining to transer without penalty and enrolled at Cincinatti. He played in the 2007 season and, once it ended, applied for an extra year of eligibility because his arm caused him to miss the entire '06 season.

The NCAA said, nah, screw you.

Mauk's arm was practically destroyed and had to be rebuilt with a titanium plate, eight screws, and three anchors in his shoulder. If a player loses an entire season (or almost an entire season) due to a catastrophic injury that he recovers from, he should be able to get that season back. But hey, this is the NCAA we're talking about.

In other news, Ryan Mallet's appeal for immediate playing time was denied, another thing I think is crap. Coaches, the guys making millions, are allowed to job hop without penalty, screwing the players in the process, without any repurcussions. If a coach jumps ship, the players at either the new school or the old should be able to jump as well without penalty. Why should they be punished because their coach a) sucks, b) is fickle, or c) gets fired?
Tags: ,

Comments

I think a better analogy would be that sorority girls like to screw the football players, not big dicks.

I mean, sure, there are some football players that get screwed by big dicks, though hopefully not in the locker room... but I digress. What were you talking about, again?

Oh, yeah... I agree, the whole eligibility thing is a crock. Every player should get four years, regardless of why they missed time, unless it's disciplinary.

Jumping schools is a bit trickier, 'cause students could claim any number of reasons why their situation became untenable. Sure, it sucks if your coach recruits you and then up and leaves, but it's the school, not the coach, that is paying your athletic scholarship.
I just realized that I was a bit unclear: Every player should get four years of eligibilty. Mauk only used three of his, therefore he deserves another.
The NCAA rules and regulations are just as difficult and twisted as politics. However, as much as I wish the kid could have gotten a chance to play all 4 years, I can see why the NCAA rejected his appeal.

I think they decided that because he used the graduate rule to play his third season that he couldn't use the injury to play his fourth. I think the injury rule really only applies to undergrads and he was technically a "graduate student" when he applied for the injury rule. Also, I would bet that the injury rule would only be applicable the season after or something.

Either way, it's stupid, but it's the rule. :(

Advertisement

Customize